A Kidnap-for-Ransom Muslim Group Called Abu Sayyaf: Calling Them Terrorist is Giving Them Too Much Credit - Instablogs
A Kidnap-for-Ransom Muslim Group Called Abu Sayyaf: Calling Them Terrorist is Giving Them Too Much Credit
Grace Calderon , Quezon City: Feb 21 2009
Made Popular Feb 24 2009
Philippines :

A Kidnap-for-Ransom Muslim Group Called Abu Sayyaf: Calling Them Terrorist is Giving Them Too Much Credit

I saw this AP news 31 minutes after it came out in the Instablogs AP wire feed. I have said it before that Associated Press may be quick but not entirely accurate. So, for a more ground feel, here are a few corrections to the AP news:

(1) The title reads ‘ Abu Sayyaf’s new generation threatens Philippines.’

No such thing as Abu Sayyaf’s new generation. It’s still the old gang, though some of the earlier leaders have been killed. It’s still the same banditry for this radical Islamist group. They are also bombers and are known to behead kidnapped hostages who cannot pay up the ransom. They also torch villages of fellow Muslims.

(2) Abu Sayyaf has always been tagged as ‘al-Qaeda-linked.’ It’s only media and the US that appends this tag. The Abu Sayyaf never heralds any link to the al-Qaeda. Which brings us to the real score in this ubiquitous al-Qaeda link tag. The Abu Sayyaf wants to be known as is, not in any connection with any group. Such is the case, too, with almost all radical Islamist groups. Makes one think what this al-Qaeda brouhaha is all about, anyway.

(3) The Abu Sayyaf has never been “all but dead, thanks to a much-heralded joint effort against terrorism by the US and the Philippine military.”

The group never ‘died.’ I’m not sure what the US participation is to this ‘much-heralded joint effort against terrorism…’

If the US, indeed, has participation, then there’s truth to the rumor that the US meddles in the military affairs of the Philippines, in the name of the infamous Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA).

There is no “fear that the Abu Sayyaf may be coming back.” It never left.

(4) “The rebirth of Abu Sayyaf raises renewed fears of terrorism.”

The Philippines does not necessarily regard Abu Sayyaf as a terror group. That’s giving this criminal syndicate too much credit. This group is not into terror per se. It is basically a radical Islamist group of marauding and pillaging bandits who has made a highly lucrative business in kidnap-for-ransom (basically, that is). They are into other money-making nefarious activities, but kidnap-for-ransom is their most popular profile.

This group, though, has offered its camps as training ground for Indonesia-originating Jemaah Islamiyah bombers. This has nothing to do with any religious ideology. The use of the camp for training is for a fee.

The Abu Sayyaf is said to be coddling the Bali bombers Umar Patek and Dulmatin in their southern Philippines stronghold. This may be true, as Patek and Dulmatin ran back to the Abu camps after a crackdown on these bombers in Indonesia.

(5) “The Philippine military did not have the funds for a full-out assault against Abu Sayyaf, so American troops came in with weapons, combat training and surveillance. They helped rein in a brief but brutal era of mass kidnappings, bombings and beheadings by the militants. Washington has poured millions of dollars into the Philippines in military assistance and civic projects.”

American soldiers are in the Philippines via the joint Philippine-US military training exercises a.k.a. Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA) precisely because the US troops want the Philippine military to teach them jungle warfare which they thought they sorely lacked after Desert Storm. So, American troops did not ‘come in with combat training and surveillance’ to help Philippine troops. What they did, and are still doing, is learning combat training and surveillance in jungle warfare from Philippine troops. The best training lesson around happens to be the Abu Sayyaf.

Is Associated Press purely American?

A Kidnap-for-Ransom Muslim Group Called Abu Sayyaf: Calling Them Terrorist is Giving Them Too Much Credit

What is absolutely true is that the Abu Sayyaf members are multimillionaires. They have raked in multimillion dollar ransoms from their victims through the years.

It is also true that they are nothing but bandits using Islam as a convenient alibi. No one believes their invocation of jihad, though.

And, yes, it is absolutely true that this group has victimized their fellow Muslims, and that Muslims in the Philippines regard them as a complete shame to their faith.

Jihad can sometimes be a multi-million dollar business.

A Kidnap-for-Ransom Muslim Group Called Abu Sayyaf: Calling Them Terrorist is Giving Them Too Much Credit

Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
2 Stars
Merasol Monteza
Zamboanga City, Philippines
I strongly agree with what had Miss Grace Calderon said, The Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG) only used Islam for thei shamefull acts. Using Islam as their shield perhaps against the hatred of their fellow Muslims and to get support. Majority of the members of this groups are illiterates and those who came from remote areas. Once they were brainwashed with the ASG leaders that they will join the group for their religion’ sake. Muslims are very faithfull in their religion. Pity for those who have wasted their lives for upon sticking to this wrong ideals of ASG. A student from Basilan province have dislosed that he opted to drop the gun and pick up the pen and paper because he realized that joining the group is the biggest mistake he’d ever committed. The acts of ASG cannot be stomached with real Islam followers.
1 Stars
Grace Calderon
Quezon City, Philippines
Thanks for the comment, Merasol. You from Zamboanga in Mindanao would know very well what I was talking about. If you’re a Muslim, you must be one of those who do not approve of these nefarious acts of your fellow Muslims.

Take care there.
2 Stars
Rudolf irokoproductions.com
New York, United States
Grace,

AP is essentially American. Their reporters and consumers are essentially American. And to make Americans understand the world, you have to tie things to what Americans know. If America has to get involved anywhere, you better tell them it has something to do with the people who caused 9/11. Otherwise, it will be too far from them and they won’t show interest. In America, we do not interpret the news. Here we swallow it. You will go crazy if you try to interpret the news as it is fed to Americans.
1 Stars
Grace Calderon
Quezon City, Philippines
Thanks for the comment, Rudolf. Brilliant analysis there from you.

I understand where AP is coming from. What gets my goat is that they are journalists who must not have any choice but VERIFY their global data before issuing them.

AP may be quick, and not a news aggregator as it differentiates itself from the likes of Google News, but they miss verifying their facts in their haste to not be a news aggregator.
Add your Comment