Global Burden of Armed Violence - Instablogs
Global Burden of Armed Violence
Grace Calderon , Quezon City: Sep 14 2008
Made Popular Sep 14 2008

Global Burden of Armed Violence

The Geneva Declaration on Armed Violence and Development was launched in 2006. Last September 12, 2008, a Ministerial Review Summit was held in Switzerland and organized in cooperation with the United Nations Development Programme. Two years into its implementation, the Summit examined the Geneva Declaration’s progress, as well as drew further guidelines for continued execution. Most of all, the Summit aimed to define practical measures that will strengthen the concept of security and development, having stated the conclusion that armed violence deters development.

The Geneva Declaration calls upon states to:

achieve demonstrable reductions in the global burden of armed violence and improvements in human security by 2015.

There are more than 90 signatory countries of the Geneva Declaration. These include Zimbabwe, Rwanda, and Afghanistan. Leading the implementation is the Core Group of 13 states: Switzerland, Brazil, Guatemala, Finland, Indonesia, Kenya, Morocco, the Netherlands, Norway, the Philippines, Spain, Thailand, and United Kingdom.

Global Burden of Armed Violence

Two years after the Geneva Declaration on Armed Violence and Development was launched, the following facts remain:

• In the recent past, at least 700,000 people have died directly or indirectly each year from armed violence

• Armed violence has had tremendous economic costs of lives lost.

• Despite the 1997 Ottawa Treaty, landmines are still prevalent throughout the Third World. The TS-50 anti-personnel (AP) mine is still common in Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, Ecuador, Georgia, Kurdistan, Kuwait, Iraq, Lebanon, Rwanda and the Western Sahara. In common with most AP mines, the TS-50 is designed to maim and cripple anyone who stands on the pressure pad bearing a small explosive blast charge. The victim is rarely killed but sustains horrendous injuries to extremities. Many of the world’s estimated 500,000 mine survivors are amputees as a result of coming into contact with AP mines. As they occur mainly in Third World countries, no precise record exists and many more are thought to be effected. Due to a very small amount of metal used in its construction, the AP mine is very hard to detect.

The first report on the Global Burden of Armed Violence was also presented at the Summit. This report contains:

the incidence, severity, and distribution of different types of armed violence in both conflict and non-conflict situations, from both large and small-scale violence, in criminally motivated and politically motivated contexts.

Global Burden of Armed Violence

Here are some of the facts contained in the Global Burden of Armed Violence report:

1. More than 740,000 people die each year as a result of conflict-related and homicidal violence.

2. More than 540,000 of these deaths are violent, with the vast majority occurring in non-conflict settings.

3. At least 200,000 people – and perhaps many thousands more – have died each year in conflict zones from non-violent causes (such as malnutrition, dysentery, and other easily preventable diseases) that resulted from the effects of war on populations.

4. Between 2004 and 2007, at least 208,300 violent deaths were recorded in armed conflicts – an average of 52,000 people killed per year. This is a conservative estimate including only recorded deaths: the real total may be much higher.

5. The annual economic cost of armed violence in non-conflict settings, in terms of lost productivity due to violent deaths, is USD 95 billion and could reach as high as USD 163 billion – 0.14 percent of the annual global GDP.

6. Armed violence occurs mostly in the developing world, and the vast majority as a result of small arms and light weapons.

7. Many armed violence reduction interventions continue to focus at the national level, yet violence is often concentrated in particular regions and among specific groups.

Global Burden of Armed Violence

The Summit produced the Summit Statement stating that the Geneva Declaration shall:

reaffirm that armed violence can undermine a country’s development prospects and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals; reaffirm that underdevelopment and inequality can fuel the incidence of armed violence; and call for further steps to address this challenge at the international, regional, and national levels.

The resolution from the Geneva Declaration that the summit drafted is on ‘Promoting development through armed violence prevention and reduction.‘ This resolution will request the UN Secretary-General to submit to the UN General Assembly a report on the relationship between armed violence and development.

Global Burden of Armed Violence

All the UN gabfest and bureaucratic rigmarole only serve to state the obvious, and merely discuss plans. This is what happens when people who are supposed to directly deal with development are found in plush offices seated on cushy expensive chairs in front of their huge state-of the art desks, and tinkering on their fully loaded PCs and laptops. These planners of development depend on churners of statistical tables who, in turn, depend on reports from independent survey agencies on field.

This path of information and general trend of producing data are the reasons why the so-called development remains a dream.

The United Nations, simply put, does not have its ear to the ground. It is small wonder, therefore, why it has no teeth.

So long as the UN persists to chew on a huge chunk of scope that may be the wrong chunk to chew, the issue of armed violence will not be addressed and hundreds of thousands will continue to die every year.

The UN merely focuses on tragic results and works around them, such as ‘Promoting development through armed violence prevention and reduction.’ It hardly hammers out solutions to address the cause. No wonder that development remains to be its ever-shining slogan.

Global Burden of Armed Violence

The biggest arms exporters in the world are: USA, Russia, EU, Germany, France, UK, Netherlands, Sweden, Italy, and China (in that order).

The biggest arms importers in the world are: China, India, Iran, Israel, Saudi Arabia, and United Arab Emirates (in that order).

China is both a seller and buyer of arms.

The United States is not a signatory of the Geneva Declaration on Armed Violence and Development.

Go figure.

Global Burden of Armed Violence

Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
3 Stars
This is one of those problems that will persist for a long, long time! The richest countries are hypocritical (USA, France, Italy are examples). Just pretend that fight something when, actually, are encouraging the sell of arms and any kind of weapons.

In the case of Russia and China, they are reportedly armed, not hide it, but I think that is condemned the U.S. position.

Reiterating what I said above, there is no solution to this problem that will last for another few hundred years. Unless Palin - the pig in skirt - takes the presidency of the United States some day and decides to confront Putin and Medvedev. Then we all will be transformed into coal, but I’m not so optimistic to the point of believing that this will occur.
3 Stars
Oops! Very good article, but are you using cocaine? 2 in less than 24 hours?
2 Stars
Grace Calderon
Quezon City, Philippines
Not quite. I’m using caffeine. Thanks! LOL
2 Stars
Grace Calderon
Quezon City, Philippines
Precisely my point! Hegemony need not be the old imperialistic strategies.

It’s all about trade - of good or bad.

China is already Asia’s hegemon, and will soon be Africa’s hegemon - because of arms.

The US? Well, it will outshine itself.
3 Stars
Radhika
mumbai, India
Hey Grace,
Good Point here.
I don’t know why we developing countries feel at the mercy of the Biggies like America. As it is there is no peace in the world, take the Delhi Bomb Blasts that took place yesterday.
I was a bad scene at my place yest coz I hv many relatives living in the area of the blasts. Thank heavens all of them came bk home safely, but my heart goes out to those who lost their lives or were injured.
2 Stars
Grace Calderon
Quezon City, Philippines
I’m sorry to hear about your relatives being in danger, Radhika. Acts of terrorism are mindless endeavors. They are done by unthinking and overzealous crusaders of some cause.

The Philippines isn’t spared from these Muslim terrorists. In fact there is a war in southern Philippines between our government and radical Islamists. And it’s the common people that are in danger and suffering.

Sometimes, it gets me to thinking that affiliation with countries such as the US isn’t really the cause of it all.

Most of the time, the situation gets out of hand because a weak and indecisive government has brought the situation to a critical point.
3 Stars
Grace,

Once again you have hit at the right place! YES, War is a big business being promoted by powerful countries...as long as business doesn’t go bankrupt conflicts are not going to end...

Celso, don’t think they will turn their markets into coals...they’ll make killing, injuring, aid and healing etc big business enterprises...
3 Stars
Grace Calderon
Quezon City, Philippines
Yes, Madkat, war is big business (read: global). The manufacturers, traders, and buyers of arms will eventually extinguish man as we know it.

Well, with the rate of destruction, they can very well take their cold cash from arms trade and use it on the moon or Mars.

And the UN which is supposed to be the watchdog, referee, conscience, etc. of global relations is inutile each time because the UN’s biggest funders and donors are the culprits themselves.

Isn’t it a stupid and losing set-up?
3 Stars
Oh Madhuri Katti, can a sociopath dream a little?
2 Stars
Jaiyant Cavale
Bangalore, India
The reason the wealthier countries are getting richer is because of their arm trade and selling ammunition to weaker nations they screwed up. If they only had to export cars and computers, they really wouldn’t be all that rich.

India is planning to buy a lot of weapons from France and Russia, now that U.S. deal has only political obligations and not legally binding ones. So, if not U.S. France and Russia will definitely find an eager customer in India.

U.N. is a fangless snake. Or must I say a watchdog whose eyes have been pierced and rendered blind by the U.S.
2 Stars
Grace Calderon
Quezon City, Philippines
I think the nuke deal stipulation is that so long as India doesn’t buy nuclear arms from somewhere else other than the US, then the deal is OK.

India is the next biggest arms purchaser, second only to China. And China is known to sell, anyway, in fact. Which makes India, in effect, the biggest sole buyer.

I wonder why India is stockpiling an arsenal...
2 Stars
Grace Calderon
Quezon City, Philippines
You know, the US used to use ’education’ as a colonizing strategy. It could still be doing it now via computers and technology skills transfer.

But I guess, it figured out that arms and war is a quicker business with faster return on investment. LOL
2 Stars
Jaiyant Cavale
Bangalore, India
You think India would buy nuclear material only from the U.S? (It produces it’s own nuclear weapons.. They need raw material) Indians have already approached Australia (negative response) and of course France and Russia. They both seem to be quite encouraging and India in fact has decided (latest news, today’s newspaper) to not wait for U.S and go ahead make transactions with the French and the Russians.

The Indian government at the moment is really pissed off with the Americans as Bush said whatever promises the Americans made were not legally binding and were just political statements. The Indians are angry that they were put through 7 months of negotiations for this nuke treaty and it all turned out to be a farce. It is time Indians or anybody else realized that U.S. can never be a partner and can only be a lying and manipulative entity. The Indians need these arms to protect themselves from Pakistan which has a huge nuclear arsenal and is the fountainhead of Islamic terrorism. And yeah, India loves shopping weapons..

U.S. wont use education anymore, the money they receive in return is a pittance, But if they were intelligent, they would know that providing education is a good P.R. strategy.
2 Stars
Grace Calderon
Quezon City, Philippines
As to the US using education, it was a very effective strategy for them. But, of course, they are more in a hurry now.

Doesn’t Pakistan buy arms from Russia?

LOL. That’s good business for Russia. I swear, the race is for trade hegemonies!
2 Stars
Jaiyant Cavale
Bangalore, India
Russia sells arms to India, Pakistan, China, Iran, Syria, Israel, and I dunno if they sell to U.S. as well.. Lol. Russia is any day more acceptable than U.S. even if it has a very bad human rights record. And I know you still have a crush on Medvedev. So no Manolo Blahniks for you.. A date with Medvedev in Moscow is what you are going to win soon. I’ll let you know.
1 Stars
Grace Calderon
Quezon City, Philippines
Well, when it comes to human rights violations, I wouldn’t easily single out Russia as the worst. US and China, and those African tyrants have maybe even worse records.

But I’m not saying that because I have a crush on Medvedev.

LOL
1 Stars
Grace Calderon
Quezon City, Philippines
And, of course, there’s the junta of Burma, the persecution of the Tibetan monks, and the record of Henry Kissinger alone as the ”butcher of Cambodia.”

:)
1 Stars
Grace Calderon
Quezon City, Philippines
And how can we forget the slaughtering of radical Islamists worldwide in the name of Allah!
2 Stars
Vijay
Kota, India
Grace,whatever type of arm it may be but the use is just to kill a living being.
Arm just harm.
2 Stars
G emeraldsandash.blogs..
Canberra, Australia
The first image was taken outside Australia’s parliament house... just an observation...
Add your Comment